Debunking Line 5 myths

To the Editor:

Misinformation that Line 5 operator Enbridge is pushing to retain massive profits ($1.6 million/day) while endangering the Great Lakes is getting to me.

Here is what people should know:

PLG Consulting, an impartial industry consultant, released a report documenting a range of Line 5 replacement options that are commercially viable and operationally feasible.

Enbridge is exaggerating the economic impact that would result from a Line 5 shutdown. Enbridge’s own expert said the impact of a Line 5 shutdown on gasoline prices would be half of a penny per gallon.

When Line 5 shut down in 2020, there was no increase in gasoline prices or shortage in supplies.

A Line 5 expansion will not create significant jobs. Most would only be temporary, and ~ 50% are filled by out-of-state workers. In fact, a Michigan group found that decommissioning Line 5 would create more jobs (~2,200) than the proposed reroute (up to 700).

No one wants to see folks lose access to fuel they need. And folks should understand that Line 5 supplies limited amounts of fuel to Wisconsin, Michigan or the U.S. It transports crude oil from western to eastern Canada, briefly cutting through Wisconsin and Michigan. However, 90-95% of Line 5 fuel is sold in foreign markets. The truth is Line 5 can be shut down without experiencing supply shortages or price spikes. Yet this pipeline risks treaty-protected lands, pristine natural areas, 400 waterways/wetlands, and precious farmland. It benefits a foreign corporation, not Wisconsin citizens. If you care about the Great Lakes, ask the Army Corp of Engineers to deny the Line 5 permit  before August 4.

Yvonne Besyk

Salem